Legal Opinion

The Charles E. Wisewall

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 12, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This was a libel in rem by certain tug owners against the steam dredge Charles E. Wisewall to recover the value of certain services rendered by their tugs in towing the dredge. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, District Judge

(orally). The proof shows conclusively that during the summer of 1895, the tugs mentioned in the libel, rendered services to the claimant’s dredge in sums aggregating several hundred. dollars. The claimant seeks to avoid payment for the services thus requested and accepted by him, upon the ground that the tug owners were members of an association which was illegal and void under the act of July 2, 1890. The courts have found it very difficult to apply the indefinite generalities of this act to the facts of any given case. Prescott & A. C. R. Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 73 Fed. 438,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prescott & A. C. R. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. of America v. Eaton Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hughes Tool Co. v. Motion Picture Ass'n of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API