Spalding v. Manasse
Supreme Court of the United States
EEROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. These were suits against a collector of customs to recover back duties paid under protest. Judgment in each case for plaintiff, to which defendant sued out a writ of error. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Eullee
All of these cases were tried by the court without a. jury, by agreement of the parties, as alleged in the record; but therq is no allegation that the stipulation was in writing, as required by the statute; and, under the ruling in Bond v. Dustin, 112 U. S. 604, and Dundee Mortgage Company v. Hughes, 124 U. S. 157, no error can be examined in the rulings of the court at the trial. Ve can only inquire whether the declarations were respectively sufficient to sustain the judgments. As there appears to be no érror in this regard, the judgments are severally
Affirmed..
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bond v. DustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dundee Mortgage & Trust Investment Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by16 opinions
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Richard J. Davis v. Knud-Hansen Memorial Hospital, Government of the Virgin Islands, and Curtis r.coulam, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- City of Cleveland v. Walsh Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- United States v. National City Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- City of Defiance v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.