Nes v. Ramsay
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 28, July T., 1893, by plaintiff, Eliza Nes, from judgment of C. P. York Co., April T., 1893, No. 33, on case stated in favor of defendant, William F. Ramsey. Case stated to determine title to real estate; The facts appear by the following opinion of the court below by Bittenger, J.: “ Eliza Nes, the plaintiff in this case, claims to recover the purchase money for real estate, described in the case stated, sold by her to the defendant.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 28, July T., 1893, by plaintiff, Eliza Nes, from judgment of C. P. York Co., April T., 1893, No. 33, on case stated in favor of defendant, William F. Ramsey. Case stated to determine title to real estate; The facts appear by the following opinion of the court below by Bittenger, J.: “ Eliza Nes, the plaintiff in this case, claims to recover the purchase money for real estate, described in the case stated, sold by her to the defendant. A deed for the said real estate purporting to convey a title fee simple to said lands, was duly tendered to the defendant, and payment of the…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The facts agreed upon, including the clauses of the respective wills of A. Hamilton Nes, and Catharine E. Nes, deeds of William J. Nes to Eliza Nes, etc., upon which the questions in dispute arose, are fully set forth in the case stated. An examination of the record has satisfied us that the questions thus presented for the decision of the court below were rightly disposed of, and hence there was no error in entering judgment on the case stated for the defendant.
For reasons given in the opinion of the learned judge of the common pleas the judgment should be affirmed.
Judgment…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Beckley v. RiegertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Crandell v. BarkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Jones v. Gulf Refining Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1928