Legal Opinion

Columbo Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 4, 1933No. 3694Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court holding tomato paste dutiable, as classified by the collector at the port of New York, as tomatoes prepared or preserved in any manner at 50 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 772 of the Tariff Act of 1930, rather than as paste composed of vegetables under paragraph 775 of that act, as claimed by appellants.

The paragraphs in question read:

Par. 772. Tomatoes in their natural state, 3 cents per pound; prepared or preserved in any manner, 50 per centum ad valorem.

Par. 775. Vegetables (including horseradish), if cut, sliced,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. RichardsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API