James v. Gray
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts.
1DissentAldrich, District Judge
I cannot agree with the conclusion reached’ in the majority opinion. I do not understand that the rule which contemplates that equity jurisdiction, practice, and procedure in the federal courts, based upon the English chancery system, shall be uniform throughout the United States, goes so far as to create a legal or equitable status in respect to the property rights of married women within a given state different from that which exists under the local laws thereof. I do not understand that federal equity accords to married women within a state power to contract or a property status distinctly…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fontain v. RavenelSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Walker v. Walker'sSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Neves v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Ewing v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.