Legal Opinion

Kennesaw Flooring, Inc. v. Rector

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 2008No. A08A0451PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

Seeking payment for materials and services provided during a home renovation, Kennesaw Flooring, Inc. sued the homeowner, Richard Rector, for breach of contract and quantum meruit. Rector moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. For reasons that follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Lane Supply v. W. H. Ferguson & Sons, Inc., 286 Ga. App. 512, 513 (649 SE2d 614) (2007). On appeal, we review the grant of summary judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. J. Kinson Cook, Inc. v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Hussey, Gay & Bell v. Georgia Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Lane Supply, Inc. v. W. H. Ferguson & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. MCC POWERS v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nash v. StuddardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Callahan v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API