United States v. Davis
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Citing United States v. Allen, 17 M.J. 126 (C.M.A.1984), appellant contends that the military judge erred in failing to grant him administrative sentence credit for 27 days of pretrial confinement served in a civilian jail.
Appellant was apprehended at the Fort Benning, Georgia, commissary by the military police while using a false military identification card in an attempt to cash a forged check. At the time of his apprehension appellant told the military police that *558he was a civilian. When military authorities were unable to verify that he was a member of the military,…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
4Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. DaveU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. BallesterosU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. StuartU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. AldridgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
- United States v. ChapmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.