Legal Opinion
In Re Humphrey
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided August 22, 1952No. 380PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
71 S.E.2d 915 (1952)
236 N.C. 141
In re HUMPHREY.
No. 380.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
August 22, 1952.
Jones, Reed & Griffin, Kinston, and Summersill & Summersill, Jacksonville, for petitioner appellant.
Warlick & Ellis and John R. B. Matthis, Jacksonville, for respondent appellee.
VALENTINE, Justice.
At the trial in the Superior Court, both petitioner and respondent offered evidence tending to support their respective contentions. Three doctors and twelve lay witnesses testified for petitioner, while three doctors and eight lay witnesses testified for respondent. All of the testimony tended to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Odom v. . RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Pendergraft v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Charles S. Hunt v. Howard H. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Beauchamp v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Clarke v. KerchnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Pope v. GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959