Legal Opinion

United States v. Allen

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 1, 2013No. Criminal No. 2009-0236Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is defendant Sean V. Allen’s unopposed pro se Motion to Reduce Sentence [185] pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Also before the Court is correspondence from Mr. Allen construed to be an exhibit to the underlying Motion. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed to post the attached correspondence to the docket along with this Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion, the entire record herein, the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny the motion.

I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API