Cactus Utility Co. v. Larson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DORSEY, Justice.
We consider this case on remand from the Supreme Court of Texas in order to examine the sufficiency of evidence to support the jury’s finding of damages. See Cactus Utility Co. v. Larson, 709 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi, 1986), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, Larson v. Cactus Utility Co., 730 S.W.2d 640 (Tex.1987).
Lew G. Larson and Larson Plumbing & Utility Company (Larson) filed suit against Cactus Utility Company (Cactus) and Hoyte Gentry, for the division of assets of Cactus, a corporation in which both Larson and Hoyte Gentry were stockholders. Based on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Larson v. Cactus Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
- Cactus Utility Co. v. Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986