Legal Opinion

Cactus Utility Co. v. Larson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1987No. 13-85-139-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DORSEY, Justice.

We consider this case on remand from the Supreme Court of Texas in order to examine the sufficiency of evidence to support the jury’s finding of damages. See Cactus Utility Co. v. Larson, 709 S.W.2d 709 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi, 1986), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, Larson v. Cactus Utility Co., 730 S.W.2d 640 (Tex.1987).

Lew G. Larson and Larson Plumbing & Utility Company (Larson) filed suit against Cactus Utility Company (Cactus) and Hoyte Gentry, for the division of assets of Cactus, a corporation in which both Larson and Hoyte Gentry were stockholders. Based on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Larson v. Cactus Utility Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cactus Utility Co. v. Larson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API