Antoskow v. Saxe

Sognier, Judge.

Appellants filed suit against appellee Saxe and others to recover medical expenses and the cost of automobile repairs allegedly resulting from the defendants’ negligence. Appellants’ motion for a default judgment against Saxe was granted due to his failure to appear for trial. A jury trial was then held to determine damages and the jury returned a verdict for Saxe. Appellants’ motion for a new trial on the general grounds was denied, and they appeal.

*42Decided September 19, 1983. Dana A. Azar, Louis T. Isaf, for appellants. Allie S. Edwards, Bruce H. Beerman, Harry A. Sneed, for…