McKeown v. Pitcock
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurrence
MAXWELL, J.,
specially concurring:
¶ 18. I agree with the majority’s affir-mance but write separately to address McKeown’s rebanee on the Mississippi Supreme Court’s recent decision in Birkhead v. State, 57 So.3d 1223 (Miss.2011). McKeown stringently and quite convincingly argues that, based on Birkhead’s apparent inclusive view of Mississippi Rule of Evidence 803(9), the deputy coroner’s statement of the cause of Janice’s death, though clearly opinion evidence, should have been admitted because it was contained in Janice’s death certificate.
Birkhead v. State
¶ 19. In Birkhead, a criminal case,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Birkhead v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Blake v. First Physicians CorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Greek v. BassettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Corlett Ex Rel. Estate of Bishop v. SmithNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
- Rees v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.