Legal Opinion
State v. Drake
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FONES, Justice.
We granted the Rule 11 application of the media entities listed in the style of this criminal case as intervenors to consider, to the extent we deem appropriate, the right of the public and the media to attend pretrial and trial proceedings in criminal cases, their right to intervene and be heard in opposition to motions for closure, and the procedure for intervention in the trial and appellate courts.
Defendant Frey moved the trial court to exclude the public and the media from pretrial hearings and prohibit communication of information about the proceedings to the public and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ballard v. HerzkeTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. SuttlesTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re NHC-Nashville Fire LitigationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- State v. SamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.