Legal Opinion

Mullins v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1994No. 49A02-9301-CR-18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Michael C. Mullins appeals his conviction for operating a vehicle with at least ten-hundredths percent (.10%) by weight of alcohol in his blood, a Class C misdemeanor.

One issue raised by Mullins is dispositive of the appeal: whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his conviction. A court reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence will neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of the witnesses. The court will consider only the evidence most favorable to the verdict, together with all reasonable inferences therefrom. If substantial evidence of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spangler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Daum v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Baran v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mullins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Baran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Baran v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API