State v. Marks
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Brazil, J.:
Arthur Marks appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after he pleaded guilty to one count of possession of cocaine with intent to sell (K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 65-4127a[a]). Marks contends that he was denied due process because the State breached its plea agreement by opposing his motion to reconsider the motion for modification of sentence and that the district court erred in refusing to follow the State Reception and Diagnostic Center (SRDC) recommendation to modify his sentence without making the required statutory findings. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- State v. MosesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- State v. WillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. SutherlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- State v. MoonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- McPherson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007