Legal Opinion
Duchmann v. Town of Hamburg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 30, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum:
Petitioners appeal from a judgment in this CPLR article 78 proceeding that, inter alia, dismissed the petition against respondents Lamar Advertising of Penn, LLC, TLC Properties, Inc., Lamar Company, LLC and Lamar Texas Limited Partnership (collectively, Lamar respondents). In 2004, the Lamar respondents entered into a lease agreement with petitioners that allowed the Lamar respondents to place a billboard on petitioners’ property. On the same day in 2004, respondent Town of Hamburg (Town) issued the Lamar respondents a permit for the construction of the billboard (hereafter, 2004…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- IDT Corp. v. Tyco Group, S.A.R.L.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cerame v. Town of Perinton Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Committee to Preserve Brighton Beach & Manhattan Beach, Inc. v. Council of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Expressview Development, Inc. v. Town of Gates Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Duchmann v. Town of HamburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- DUCHMANN, PETER S. v. TOWN OF HAMBURGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- EXPRESSVIEW DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. TOWN OF GATES ZONING BOARD OF APPEAAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017