Clark v. State

Sognier, Judge.

Appellants were convicted in a joint trial of child molestation and they appeal.

1. Appellants contend the trial court’s charge on voluntary intox ication was erroneous, and that the court erred by denying appellant Singletary’s request to charge on voluntary intoxication. The court’s charge on voluntary intoxication was as follows: “Ladies and gentlemen, I charge you that our law provides that voluntary intoxication shall not be an excuse for any criminal act. It provides further that if a person’s mind, when unexcited by intoxicants, is capable of distinguishing between right…