Legal Opinion
Owen v. Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 2, 1993No. 90 CV 0505; CA A71547PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Plaintiff brought this legal malpractice action against defendants for failing to file a timely request for a hearing on the workers’ compensation claim of plaintiffs deceased husband. A jury found in favor of plaintiff. She appeals from the court’s denial of her “motion to increase judgment” on her claim for interest. We affirm.
Plaintiff contends that her claim is not for interest on the workers’ compensation benefits that the insurer would have been required to pay. She acknowledges that we disallowed such a claim in Haret v. SAIF, 72 Or App 668, 697 P2d 201, rev den 299 Or 313 (1985).1 She…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- State Highway Commission v. DealOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Haret v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Shepherd v. Hub Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- LITHIA LUMBER COMPANY v. LambOregon Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Owen v. Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & ConboyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993