Legal Opinion

United States v. Weems

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 18, 2018No. 17-1059PPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

Kendall Rose, Ike Weems, Anthony Sabetta, and Alberto Rodríguez (collectively, the "Defendants") brought motions under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct their sentences. They argued that, in the wake of Johnson v. United States ( Johnson II ), --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 2551 , 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015), their convictions for the Rhode Island offense of Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (A/BDW), see R.I. Gen. Laws § 11-5-2(a), no longer qualify as predicate convictions triggering the Armed Career Criminals Act's (ACCA) mandatory 15-year sentence, see 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  4. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Borden v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  2. United States v. Cruz-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Baez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  4. King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  5. Shea v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API