Esparza v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
The Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) appeals from an order of the circuit court setting aside a LIRC decision which determined that Francisco Esparza was ineligible to receive unemployment benefits. LIRC decided that Esparza was ineligible for benefits because he was substantially unavailable for work. Because LIRC's conclusion was reasonable, the circuit court erred by setting aside LIRC's determination. We therefore reverse.
Esparza began working for American Motors Corporation (AMC) in September 1982. His duties included the operation of air guns. During the course of his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Milwaukee Transformer Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Stafford Trucking, Inc. v. State, Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Nigbor v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Kessler v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Trabold Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Schachtner v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations, Equal Rights DivisionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Behnke v. Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Farrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988
- Probst v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.