Legal Opinion

Hakala v. Atxam Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1988No. S-1866PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This appeal involves the statutory interpretation of the phrase “a primary place of business,” as contained in § 14(c)(1) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), 43 U.S.C. § 1613(c)(1) (1986). Section 14(c)(1) requires a village corporation, upon receiving its interim conveyance of land from the federal government, to reconvey to the occupant any land used, as of December 18, 1971, as “a primary place of business.” Since 1969, George Kitchen, later with help from Steven Hakala, guided brown bear hunts on the Canoe Bay lands to which Atxam, a village…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ZabkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Wilson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Alaska Public Easement Defense Fund v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kenai Peninsula Borough v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Donnelly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Mark Buettner Henry G. Hamar v. Kavilco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. City of Ketchikan v. Cape Fox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Capener v. Tanadgusix Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API