Bee v. Seaman
West Virginia Supreme Court
cited 10 S. «E. Rep. 56; 9 S. E. Rep. 51; Black Jdgmts. §§ 183,184; 16 ~W. Ya. 245; 14 W. Ya. 264; Code, c. 134 ss. 5, 6. cited Code, e. 50, ss. 26, 48, 49, 50, 52; 5 H. H. 391; 1 Oliit. p. 12, §§ 13, 14, n. 1; Code, c. 134, s. 586.
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Judge:
On the 9th of October, 1888, the plaintiffs below and plaintiffs here brought suit before A. B. Thohn, then a justice of Roane county, for the recovery of two hundred ’dollars for damages for a wrong — so styled in the summons. The summons was returnable and in fact returned before the justice, A. B. TiíORN, on the 20th of October, 1888. The parties were present in person and by counsel; and plaintiffs filed their complaint in writing, which was excepted to by counsel for defendants.. The complaint states fully, but in a plain and direct manner, the facts constituting the cause of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Poe v. Machine WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
- Barlow v. DanielsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Long v. Ohio River R'y. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by14 opinions
- Richmond v. HendersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
- Morgan v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Danielley v. City of PrincetonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933
- Lipscomb v. Tucker County CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co. v. State Road CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.