Legal Opinion

United States v. Auckland Holmes

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 27, 1972No. 17722-17729PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENS, Circuit Judge.

Each of the eight appellants was convicted on one or more counts of an indictment charging conspiracy and substantive violations of the Federal narcotics laws. 1 The conspiracy allegedly continued from as early as August of 1966, to and including October 18, 1967. On that date an indictment which had been returned in March, and which named only five of the appellants as defendants, was superseded by a second indictment naming them all. The substantive counts related to four specific transactions, all of which were also identified as acts pursuant to the continuing…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Saravia v. SessionsDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. United States v. Roy L. Williams, Thomas F. O'malley, Andrew G. Massa, Joseph LombardoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Alexander DurriveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API