Legal Opinion

Republic Automobile Insurance v. Maedel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 157, Calendar No. 35,445PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The automobiles of Edward Maedel and Ivan Lambert collided on a highway in Sanilac county. Lambert’s insurer, Republic Automobile Insurance Company, plaintiff here, settled with him and took assignment of his rights, if any, to recover against Maedel. Maedel commenced a tort action against Lambert in the Sanilac circuit court to recover damages arising out of the collision, averred to be due to Lambert’s negligence. This suit is pending. Later, plaintiff, assignee of Lambert, commenced this tort action against . Maedel in the Genesee circuit court to recover damages of the same accident,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seager v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Morgan v. HoeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chunko v. LeMaitreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. State, Ex Rel. McHenry v. CalhounOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. Weiner v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  5. Nelson v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API