Legal Opinion

State v. Fuqua

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 9, 2018No. A-4 September Term 2017; 079034PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Timpone

**587*963In this case, the Court considers whether the State must prove actual harm to a child to convict a defendant under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a), endangering the welfare of children. Because the trial court and Appellate Division correctly determined that a conviction under N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4(a) can be sustained by exposing children to a substantial risk of harm, we affirm their denial of defendant Danyell Fuqua's motion for a judgment of acquittal.

I

We marshal these facts from the record.

In September 2011, the Middlesex County Prosecutor's Office opened a narcotics investigation into Tyrell…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. State v. ReyesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  5. New Jersey Department of Children & Families v. A.L.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kocanowski v. Twp. of BridgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Penske Truck Leasing, Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  3. C.R. v. M. T.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2024
  4. C.R. v. M. T.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2024
  5. DCPP VS. Q.B., C.G., AND C.H., IN THE MATTER OF Q.B., H.H., J.H. AND C.H., JR. (FN-12-0140-16, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API