Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Fields v. Bi-State Development Agency

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2017No. 16-3783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Circuit Judge.

Bi-State Development Agency (Bi-State) appeals the denial of its motion for summary judgment. It argues that the district court 1 erred in holding that Bi-State was not an arm of the state and therefore not entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity in this False Claims Act (FCA) action brought by a private actor. Having jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a), see P.R. Aqueduct & Sewer Auth. v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 506 U.S. 139, 144, 113 S.Ct. 684, 121 L.Ed.2d 605 (1993) (appeal from the denial of summary judgment based on sovereign immunity falls within a narrow…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Federal Maritime Commission v. South Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Good v. United States Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  2. Chapter 7 Trustee Fredrich Cruse v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Missouri-Illinois Metropolitan DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. Colt v. New Jersey Tr. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. LANGE v. HOUSTON COUNTY, GEORGIADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2020
  5. Lisa Wilson v. Attorney General and Commissioner of AdministrationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API