Legal Opinion

Succession of Nobles

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1996No. Nos. 96 CM 0398, 96 CA 0468Published

1Opinion of the Court

IzWHIPPLE, Judge.

This matter is presently before us on a motion to dismiss filed by appellee, Antin and Lorenz, a professional law corporation, seeking dismissal of the suspensive appeal of the United States of America. For the following reasons, we deny the motion to dismiss the appeal and remand the matter to the trial court to fix an appropriate appeal bond.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The United States filed a motion for sus-pensive appeal from a judgment rendered by the trial court determining the priority and ranking of competing claims to the assets of the estate of Harry Edwin Nobles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parish of Jefferson v. Bonnabel Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. MarksSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Advanced Collision Serv. v. State, DotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. v. STEIMLE & ASSOC., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. United States Department of the Air Force v. WilhelmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API