Legal Opinion

Florio v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1990No. 1107-88PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

McCORMICK, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with injury to a child by omission. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.04. In a jury trial appellant was convicted of the charged offense and sentenced to sixty years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections.

The Houston Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction. Florio v. State, 758 S.W.2d 351 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1988). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to consider the following grounds for review: (1) whether the Court of Appeals erred in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ronk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Florio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. FlorioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Florio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Hicks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
  4. COCKRELL, RAY LEE v. the State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2025
  5. Cyr, Danna PresleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API