Legal Opinion

Norwood v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 4, 2011No. A11A0979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARNES, Presiding Judge.

Following his negotiated guilty plea to obstruction of an officer and disorderly conduct, Vincent Norwood moved to withdraw his guilty plea contending that trial counsel was ineffective and that his plea was not entered voluntarily and knowingly. Norwood now appeals the denial of his motion, and argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to apprise him of the consequences of his plea to his probation status, and thus, as he lacked this knowledge, his plea was not entered voluntarily and knowingly. For the reasons that follow, we find that the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  2. McCloud v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Collie Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Frances Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2023
  5. Sylvester Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API