Legal Opinion

Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. v. J. T. Wilson Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1933No. 6268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

This was an action upon a policy of fire insurance whereby defendant (appellant) agreed to indemnify plaintiff (appellee), to an amount not exceeding $9;000, against all direct loss and damage by fire to the “use and occupancy” of plaintiff’s business property. Under the provisions of the policy, the in-sufed was entitled to recover the net profits which, but for the fire, would have been earned, and also fixed expenses theretofore earned in connection with such business, but which, because of the fire, the insured was prevented from earning during a given period.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Central Nat. Fire Ins. Co. of Chicago v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. Bumstead v. . the Dividend Mutual Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles Taylor Marine, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Du Bois v. Camden Fire Ins.District Court, E.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API