Haik v. Gammill
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
CARLTON, J.,
for the Court:
¶ 1. This appeal stems from a complaint filed in the Adams County Chancery Court by Kenneth G. Haik and Diana W. Haik, alleging that James D. Gammill, Britton D. Gammill, John T. Ball, and Eileen Ball1 possessed no right to access their respective properties by use of an existing driveway (hereinafter “Service Road”) on the Haiks’ property. The Gammills and Balls filed counterclaims and amended counterclaims asking the chancellor to determine that the Gammills and Balls had an easement over the Service Road to access their respective properties.
¶ 2. The chancellor…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Fuselier v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
- Poole Ex Rel. Poole v. AvaraMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Sanderson v. SandersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. Hinds CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wade H. Hardy, Jr. v. Gene William HardyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018
- Dempsey Sullivan v. Estate of Samuel MaddoxCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2019
- Michael Hobby and Regina Luwana Hobby v. Wanda Ott and Peggy J. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2023