Legal Opinion

James v. Saul

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 12, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Wachtel, J.

This is a motion by the defendant for leave to serve a supplemental answer setting forth a judgment in a prior action in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, as res judicata.

The action in the case at bar arises out of an accident in which the automobiles of the plaintiff and the defendant collided. The collision caused personal injuries to passengers in the defendant’s automobile. These passengers sued the plaintiff and defendant as codefendants in the Supreme Court, Bronx County. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs against all the defendants, including the owners and drivers of both…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Good Health Dairy Products Corp. v. EmeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. Rudd v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. George Colon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moyle v. Cronin, New York County Courts1959
  2. Friedman v. SalvatiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  3. Ordway v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Camaioni v. CarusoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  5. Grande v. TorelloNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API