Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Stephens
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 24, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Order entered March 30, 1982, reversed, with $10 costs, and motion denied, without prejudice to such proceedings as tenants may be advised to bring to adjudicate their rights.
In December, 1978, the parties in open court stipulated to the settlement of holdover summary proceedings, agreeing, inter alia, that petitioners were to tender a lease containing a clause to the effect “that in the event the building is co-oped, the tenants shall have the option of first offer as tenants in possession, subject to tenants qualifying and there being no illegality”. In accordance with…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- European-American Banking Corp. v. Chock Full O'Nuts Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
- Bezio v. BezioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
4Cited by4 opinions
- Topaz Realty Corp. v. MoralesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
- 133 Plus 24 Sanford Ave. Realty Corp. v. Xiu Lan NiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2015
- Scott v. Dale Carpet Cleaning, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- A.B. Medical Services PLLC v. Countrywide InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2005