Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. United States
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 14, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00359Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO VAUDENCIA CEBALLOS HAMILTON, Case No. 1:20-cv-00359-DCN Petitioner, 1:18-cr-00086-DCN v. MEMORANDUM DECISION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER Respondent. I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Vaudencia Ceballos Hamilton’s Motion to Reconsider (Dkt. 9).1 Having reviewed the record, the Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented. Thus, in the interest of avoiding further delay, and because oral argument would not significantly aid its decisional process, the Court will decide the Motion without oral…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Howard Turner Mary Turner Bill Oskowski Marisa Oskowski v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.