Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge,
with whom HUG, Chief Judge, and PREGERSON, MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, join, concurring in part and dissenting in part:
We concur in the substance of Judge Fernandez’ opinion except that we would not remand the issue of eligibility to participate in the SPP to the Plan Administrator and would hold that the Workers are eligible to participate. Remand is inappropriate and further unnecessary in that we conclude that interpretation of the phrase “on the United States payroll of the employer” is not required.
In its denial of the Workers’ claim, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Marjorie Booton v. Lockheed Medical Benefit PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1375, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4487, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7305, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921c Gloria Snow v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Melvin A. Nelson Wayne F. Schnepple v. Eg & G Energy Measurements Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.