State v. McDonald
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Justice.
{1} In this opinion we decide whether sentencing under NMSA 1978, Section 31-18-15(A)(2), -(4) (1999, prior to 2003 amendments) requires that a jury, and not the judge, determine whether the crime is one “resulting in the death of a human being.” Applying Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we conclude that the court erred in not submitting the question to the jury, but we also find the error harmless in the context of this case. Secondly, we hold that conspiracy is not an enumerated “serious violent offense” under the Earned…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Torres v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. TafoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. McClaughertyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. MontanoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2024
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.