Eufrazia v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff was injured while employed by defendant railroad company as an advanced carman helper in the construction of parts for new railroad cars, and he brought this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Before trial of the other issues, the court held a hearing on the question of whether the federal act was applicable and concluded that it was not. Judgment was entered accordingly, and plaintiff appeals.
On June 13, 1951, plaintiff, who had worked for defendant during the previous nine months repairing railroad cars already in service, began assembling “ends” for new…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gileo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by1 opinion
- Southern Pacific Co. v. GileoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956