Legal Opinion

Eufrazia v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1955No. Sac. No. 6522PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff was injured while employed by defendant railroad company as an advanced carman helper in the construction of parts for new railroad cars, and he brought this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. Before trial of the other issues, the court held a hearing on the question of whether the federal act was applicable and concluded that it was not. Judgment was entered accordingly, and plaintiff appeals.

On June 13, 1951, plaintiff, who had worked for defendant during the previous nine months repairing railroad cars already in service, began assembling “ends” for new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gileo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. GileoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API