Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Ochoa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), dated September 11, 2002, as denied that branch of their motion which was to compel the plaintiff to undergo an examination by a vocational rehabilitation specialist, and (2) an order of the same court dated May 9, 2003, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

It is well settled that the supervision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kavanagh v. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Palermo Mason Construction, Inc. v. Aark Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Rizzotto v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Williams v. FitzsimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Aspen Ford, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Cohen v. Wallace & MinchenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Gerbino v. GerbinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API