Legal Opinion
Florez v. Marshall
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 2, 2009No. Case CV 09-1175-RGK(RC)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District .Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the petition and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rosalyn M. Chapman, as well as petitioner’s objections, and has made a de novo determination.
IT IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted; (2) the Report and Recommendation is adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law herein; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ylst v. NunnemakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.