Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. Gruben
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Error from Sumner District Court. Hon. .James A. Hay, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtMilton, J.
Defendants in error, on June 19, 1888, entered into a written contract with an agent of the plaintiff in error for the purchase of a threshing machine and horse-power. The contract contained an order for the machine, describing it, and an agreement by purchasers to receive the same at Caldwell, Kan., to pay the freight charges thereon, and to give three notes, each for one-third of the purchase price, which was $596 net to the Company; it also contained the following clauses:
“It is agreed that the only warranty or representations binding upon the seller are as follows :
“1. That said machinery…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- P. Weybrich & Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Koch v. RhodesMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Van Natta v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Geiger v. CardwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.