Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stryker
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
1 In their brief the appellees note that at trial Earnest H. Stryker and Cecil A. Brown in their individual capacities, were dismissed from this action because they were not the legal owners of the subject property in this case: instead their wives Dorothy J Stryker and Doris J Brown were the legal owners of the properly. For this reason, although the filings of the appellant and those of the appellees are styled Phillips Petroleum Companyv. Earnest H. Stryker, et al., this court has named the appellees as Dorothy J. Stryker et al. The trial courts judgment referred to the plaintiffs as…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sheffield v. Exxon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- The CALIFORNIA CO. v. BrittMississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Ivy Ellis Mize and Wife, Voncile Mize v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Baumgartner v. Gulf Oil CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re BassTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- MacQuarie Bank Ltd. v. KnickelDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2010
- Ankor Energy, LLC v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Matthews v. Ankor Energy, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018
- Matthews v. Ankor Energy, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018