Marport, Inc., an Oregon Corporation and California Dredging, a California Corporation v. Stabbert and Associates, Inc., a Washington Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Marport concedes that under the terms of the towage agreement, it may recover from Stabbert only by demonstrating that the tug’s unseaworthiness caused Mar-port’s loss. The district court, failing to find any material factual issue as to the seaworthiness of the tug, granted summary judgment for Stabbert. Because we agree with the ruling of the district court, we need not pass upon Stabbert’s opening contention that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law under The Umbria, 166 U.S. 404, 17 S.Ct. 610, 41 L.Ed. 1053 (1897), and progeny. See, e.g., A & S Transportation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- The UmbriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Inland Oil and Transport Co., Cross-Appellant v. Ark-White Towing Co., Murphy Marine Service, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Anthony v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Illinois Constructors Corp. v. Logan Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re White Cloud Charter Boat Co., Inc. Frances Arkin, Bradley Arkin and Robert Arkin, and Reynaldo Ortiz, Alvin Dick and Roberta Dick v. White Cloud Charter Boat Co., Inc., Arthur Kaplan and Walter Roberts, Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs v. Alvin Dick, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Haines v. Honolulu Shipyard, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Arkin v. White Cloud Charter Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Larry Alexander v. Ingram Barge CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017