Legal Opinion

Lerman v. Diagnostic Data, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 23, 1980PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Vice Chancellor.

This is an action brought by a dissident shareholder who, along with others, is attempting to wage a proxy contest so as to elect a slate of directors in opposition to those nominated for the board by management. As a result of certain amendments to the defendant corporation’s by-laws which were accomplished after incumbent management was on notice of plaintiff’s intention to wage a proxy contest, it has now become impossible for the plaintiff and his compatriots to literally comply with the amended by-laws, the requirements of which impose conditions which must be met…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  2. Condec Corporation v. Lunkenheimer CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1967
  3. Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
  4. Bank of Delaware v. Estate of KaneCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Stroud v. GraceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Pogostin v. RiceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Moran v. Household International, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  4. Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1988
  5. Aprahamian v. HBO & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API