Andrew v. Hinderman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Grant County. The facts are stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appealed from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtCole, C. J.
Ve think the demurrer to the complaint should have been overruled. The action is brought by the plaintiff, as administratrix of Joseph Hinderman, deceased, to cancel and set aside certain deeds, which, it is alleged, Flinderman made iff his lifetime with the intent to defraud *149his creditors. It appears to ns that the action is clearly authorized by sec. 3832, R. S., which provides: “When there shall be a deficiency of assets in the hands of an executor or administrator, and when the deceased shall in his lifetime have conveyed any real estate, or an3' right or interest therein, with intent to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- German Bank v. LeyserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. RutherfordNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Neelen v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Ecklor v. WolcottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Hofmann v. TuckerNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Mann v. GrinwaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930