Legal Opinion

Berriault v. Wareham Fire District

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Upon this bill for declaratory relief the following facts were established by the pleadings or justifiably found by the trial judge. The plaintiffs own land in the “West Wareham annexation” of the Wareham Fire District (the district). See St. 1907, c. 178 (fn. 2, infra). West Wareham was added to the district by vote of the district at its 1966 annual meeting. At the annual district meeting held on March 11, 1968, the district accepted G. L. c. 40, §§ 42G-42I.1

*162In 1967, the district engaged engineers to prepare plans for supplying water to the West Wareham. annexation and later made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Kagan v. United Vacuum Appliance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. Opinions of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  4. Brucato v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  5. Marshal House v. RENT REVIEW & GRIEVANCE BD, BROOKLINEMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gallo v. Division of Water Pollution ControlMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. Gudanowski v. Town of NorthbridgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  3. California Village Corp. v. Town of East LongmeadowMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
  4. Berriault v. Wareham Fire DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Higgins v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API