Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Forman v. Clatsop County

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1984No. TC CC82-156; CA A24527; SC 29833Published

1ConcurrencePeterson, C. J.

I fully agree with the majority and write separately to raise a concern long felt but hitherto unexpressed in an opinion.

If a person intended to create an inefficient, unpredictable, ineffective, expensive, unresponsive system for review of governmental acts, he or she would use the system we have in Oregon as a perfect model. Ours is senseless and cries for revision. We need an all-purpose writ.

Under our monstrous system, the most intelligent lawyer rarely can advise the client with any measure of confidence. The wealthy client risks his fortune by venturing into the morass of review of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Board of CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Brooks v. DierkerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Western Amusement Co., Inc. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Neuberger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Patton v. State Board of Higher EducationOregon Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API