Legal Opinion

Ringering v. Compania Maritima De-La-Mancha

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 9, 1987No. Civ. 86-105-PAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PANNER, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Merlin Ringering brings this action in admiralty against Compania Marítima De-La-Mancha (Compania), and the vessel M/V Travemar Africa (Africa) for negligence, unseaworthiness, and violations of the Jones Act. Prior to trial, plaintiff withdrew the Jones Act claims. A court trial was held from December 17, 1986 to December 22, 1986. I find the handrail is unseaworthy, defendants were negligent, and plaintiff was 20% contributorily negligent. Defendants are liable for plaintiff’s economic loss from January 22, 1986 to December 19, 1986 in the amount of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boudoin v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Usner v. Luckenbach Overseas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Elijah Dubose v. Matson Navigation Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. Russell Litherland v. Petrolane Offshore Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bach v. Trident Shipping Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1988
  2. Blancq v. Hapag-Lloyd A.G.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1997
  3. Wallace S. Harwood, Jr. v. Partredereit Af 15.5.81, Wallace S. Harwood, Jr. v. Partredereit Af 15.5.81Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Wallace S. Harwood, Jr. v. Partredereit Af 15.5.81, Wallace S. Harwood, Jr. v. Partredereit Af 15.5.81Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API