Legal Opinion

Gurney v. Collins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1887PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne. (Speed, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, C. J.

Plaintiff, who was a manufacturer in Eochester, New York, sued defendants, under the common counts, for a brick-making machine and appurtenances, which he claimed they ordered from. Detroit, and he sent to them there in April and May, 1884. Defendants pleaded the general issue.

On the trial the chief controversy was whether defendants had purchased and accepted the machine absolutely, or whether it was sent to them, or kept by them, under circumstances which made them bound to pay the purchase price as demanded. After the testimony was all in, the court took the case from the jury, and ordered…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. NixonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API