Legal Opinion

Russell v. Douthitt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1973No. 772S100Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

DeBruler, J.

I dissent from the majority because the policy of the parole board which prevents a citizen from being represented by his counsel at a parole revocation hearing violates that citizen’s rights to due process of law guaranteed to him by both the Federal and State Constitutions.

Recently the United States Supreme Court in Morrissey v. Brewer (1972), 92 S. Ct. 2593, 33 L. Ed. 2d 484, held that parole revocation hearings are the type of proceedings by which the individual may be condemned to suffer grievous loss and furthermore that the type of loss suffered is one…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API