Legal Opinion

Town of Cortlandt v. . New York Central Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 24, 1916, in favor of defendant upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 24, 1916, in favor of defendant upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The sole question is whether the duty rests upon the town or the railroad company to repair the roadway of a bridge carrying a public high-, way called Croton Neck road across the main line tracks and yard of the defendant at Harmon, a station on the line of defendant’s railroad in the town of Cortlandt, between the stations of Ossining and Croton.

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, Cardozo and Pound, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Mount Vernon v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  2. City of Mount Vernon v. FeinbergNew York Supreme Court · 1951